Yoma 18b ~ Yom Kippur, The High Priest and Nocturnal Pollution

The Mishnah on today’s page of Talmud describes the preparations undertaken by the Cohen Gadol (High Priest) serving at the Temple in Jerusalem, in the run up to the holiest day of the year, Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement:

וימא יח, א

כל שִׁבְעַת הַיָּמִים לֹא הָיוּ מוֹנְעִין מִמֶּנּוּ מַאֲכָל וּמִשְׁתֶּה, עֶרֶב יוֹם הַכִּפּוּרִים עִם חֲשֵׁיכָה לֹא הָיוּ מַנִּיחִין אוֹתוֹ לֶאֱכוֹל הַרְבֵּה, מִפְּנֵי שֶׁהַמַּאֲכָל מֵבִיא אֶת הַשֵּׁינָה

For seven days before Yom Kippur they would not withhold any food or drink from the Cohen Gadol that he desired. However, on Yom Kippur eve at nightfall, they would not allow him to eat a great deal because food induces sleep [and they did not allow him to sleep].

The Talmud explains why the Cohen Gadol was not allowed to sleep:

תַּנְיָא, רַבִּי יְהוּדָה בֶּן נָקוֹסָא אוֹמֵר: מַאֲכִילִין אוֹתוֹ סְלָתוֹת וּבֵיצִים כְּדֵי לְמַסְמְסוֹ. אָמְרוּ לוֹ: כל שֶׁכֵּן שֶׁאַתָּה מְבִיאוֹ לִידֵי חִימּוּם

…Rabbi Yehuda ben Nekosa says: On Yom Kippur eve they feed him fine flour and eggs in order to loosen his bowels, so that he will not need to relieve himself on Yom Kippur. They said to Rabbi Yehuda ben Nekosa: In feeding him those foods, all the more so that you bring him to a state of arousal. [Feeding him those foods is antithetical to the efforts to prevent the High Priest from becoming impure, as they are liable to cause him to experience a seminal emission.]

How to Prevent a nocturnal Seminal Emission

Leaving aside the dispute about the details, the goal of the menu was not in question. It was to prevent the Cohen Gadol from a nocturnal seminal emission. Actually the menu was also important, as we read later on:

לֹא אֶתְרוֹג, וְלֹא בֵּיצִים, וְלֹא בָּשָׂר שָׁמֵן, וְלֹא יַיִן יָשָׁן. וְיֵשׁ אוֹמְרִים: אַף לֹא יַיִן לָבָן, מִפְּנֵי שֶׁהַיַּיִן לָבָן מֵבִיא אֶת הָאָדָם לִידֵי טוּמְאָה

They do not feed him citrons, eggs or aged wine, and some say they also do not feed him white wine, because white wine causes a person to become ritually impure through a seminal emission…

דְּתָנוּ רַבָּנַן: חֲמִשָּׁה דְּבָרִים מְבִיאִים אֶת הָאָדָם לִידֵי טוּמְאָה, וְאֵלּוּ הֵן: הַשּׁוּם וְהַשַּׁחֲלַיִם וַחֲלֹגְלוֹגוֹת וְהַבֵּיצִים וְהַגַּרְגִּיר

…The Sages taught: Five food items bring a man to a state of impurity due to emission. And these are: Garlic, cress, purslane, eggs, and arugula.

And then comes this helpful advice, unrelated to Yom Kippur:

אָמַר רַב גִּידֵּל אָמַר רַב: אַכְסְנַאי לֹא יֹאכַל בֵּיצִים, וְלֹא יִישַׁן בְּטַלִּיתוֹ שֶׁל בַּעַל הַבַּיִת

Rav Giddel said that Rav said: A guest should neither eat eggs, because they lead to a seminal emission, nor sleep in a garment belonging to the homeowner, his host, because if he experiences a seminal emission and it gets on the garment, he will be diminished in the estimation of his host…

Now back to the main attraction. The next Mishnah outlines how the night of Yom Kippur was spent keeping the Cohen Gadol awake:

יומא יח, ב

אִם (הוּא) הָיָה חָכָם — דּוֹרֵשׁ, וְאִם לָאו — תַּלְמִידֵי חֲכָמִים דּוֹרְשִׁים לְפָנָיו. וְאִם רָגִיל לִקְרוֹת — קוֹרֵא, וְאִם לָאו — קוֹרִין לְפָנָיו. וּבַמֶּה קוֹרִין לְפָנָיו: בְּאִיּוֹב וּבְעֶזְרָא וּבְדִבְרֵי הַיָּמִים. זְכַרְיָה בֶּן קְבוּטָל אוֹמֵר: פְּעָמִים הַרְבֵּה קָרִיתִי לְפָנָיו בְּדָנִיֵּאל.

If he was a scholar, he would teach Torah. If he was not a scholar, Torah scholars would teach Torah before him. And if he was accustomed to read the Bible, he would read; and if he was not, they would read the Bible before him. And what books would they read before him to pique his interest so that he would not fall asleep? They would read from Job, and from Ezra, and from Chronicles. Zekharya, son of Kevutal, says: Many times I read before him from the book of Daniel.

Rashi reminds us why all of this was necessary:

אם היה חכם דורש - בדבר הלכה כל ליל יוה"כ שלא יישן ויראה קרי

If he was a scholar, he would teach Torah - words of Jewish law throughout the night of Yom Kippur, so that he does not falls asleep and possibly have a seminal emission.

Later in this tractate (36a) the Talmud states that one of the sacrifices on Yom Kippur was performed in an unusual location in the Temple. It took place there משום חולשה דכהן גדולֹ - “because the Cohen Gadol was weak” and the new location would save him from the need to carry the sacrificial blood a few more steps. But this concern for the “weakness of the Cohen Gadol seems counterintuitive. On the one hand, he is made to stay awake for the entire night in order to prevent the remote possibility of a nocturnal seminal emission. This was an enormous physical imposition. As an emergency physician I worked hundreds of night shifts and can attest to how physically draining they are. (For those of you who want a sense of this, remember the last time you took an overnight flight. How did you feel coming off the plane?) And on the other hand we go to unusual efforts to minimize any unnecessary physical activity that he might be required to do.

All this demonstrates that the Talmudic concern for a Cohanic nocturnal emission was extremely serious. For this reason several interventions were put in place to prevent this possibility, even though they seem to be in themselves onerous.ּ But we are not quite done yet.

no one got any sleep on the night of yom kippur

יומא יט, ב

מַתְנִי׳ בִּקֵּשׁ לְהִתְנַמְנֵם, פִּרְחֵי כְהוּנָּה מַכִּין לְפָנָיו בְּאֶצְבַּע צְרָדָא, וְאוֹמְרִים לוֹ: אִישִׁי כֹּהֵן גָּדוֹל! עֲמוֹד וְהָפֵג אַחַת עַל הָרִצְפָּה. וּמַעֲסִיקִין אוֹתוֹ עַד שֶׁיַּגִּיעַ זְמַן הַשְּׁחִיטָה.

unsplash-image--R2uNyGmeM4.jpg

MISHNA: If the High Priest sought to sleep at night, the young priests would snap the middle [tzerada] finger against the thumb before him, and they would say to him every so often: My Master, High Priest. Stand from your bed and chill yourself once on the floor and overcome your drowsiness. And they would engage him in various ways until the time would arrive to slaughter the daily offering.

In fact the Talmud notes that lots of people, and not just the young priests, would stay awake all night for the singular purpose of preventing the Cohen Gadol from dozing, and perhaps having a nocturnal emission:

יומא יט, ב

מִיַּקִּירֵי יְרוּשָׁלַיִם לֹא הָיוּ יְשֵׁנִין כל הַלַּיְלָה, כְּדֵי שֶׁיִּשְׁמַע כֹּהֵן גָּדוֹל קוֹל הֲבָרָה וְלֹא תְּהֵא שֵׁינָה חוֹטַפְתּוֹ. תַּנְיָא, אַבָּא שָׁאוּל אָמַר: אַף בִּגְבוּלִין הָיוּ עוֹשִׂין כֵּן זֵכֶר לַמִּקְדָּשׁ

The prominent men of Jerusalem would not sleep the entire night but instead engaged in Torah study, so that the High Priest would hear the sound of noise in the city and sleep would not overcome him in the silence of the sleeping city. It was taught in a Baraita that Abba Shaul said: They would do so even in the outlying areas and stay awake all night in acknowledgment of the Temple…

Let’s summarize all this. Here are the steps that were taken in order to prevent the possibility of the Cohan Gadol falling asleep and having a nocturnal seminal emission:

  • The Cohen Gadol was fed a special diet on the eve of Yom Kippur.

  • He was not fed eggs, white wine or garlic, which were thought to cause a nocturnal emission

  • He stayed awake the whole night.

  • Other had to stay up all night too, in order to study with the Cohen Gadol to keep him from dozing.

  • The general population of Jerusalem (and some of the local villages too) also stayed up all night so that the noise of their learning would keep the Cohen Gadol awake.

Given the extremes to which the Jews of the Temple time went to prevent the High Priest from the remote possibility of a nocturnal seminal emission, we can conclude that it was an extremely unwanted event. So today we will examine the science of nocturnal seminal emissions.

A Medical History of Nocturnal emissions

In his helpful paper on the topic, Mels van Driel, a Dutch urologist, noted that “penile (and clitoral) erections occur in several contexts, some of which have nothing to do with sexuality - for example the nocturnal ones.” He points out that these erections occur in infants, whom we may fairly suppose are not having erotic dreams. In adults they may not always be accompanied by dreams with an erotic content.

Plato (427–347 BCE) described the penis as “disobedient and self-willed, like a creature that is deaf to reason, and it attempts to dominate all because of its frenzied lusts.” The Greek physician Galen (129-200 CE), who was the first to describe the penile anatomy responsible for erections, wrote that “men full of sperm will imagine that they are having sexual intercourse” so that the more intercourse there was, the less would be the frequency of nocturnal emissions.

The early Church Fathers were remarkably modern in their understanding. St. Augustine (354–430 CE) wrote that a wet dream was not the fault of the dreamer, “since the dreamer cannot control the images that appear in his dreams.” Another famous theologian, Thomas Aquinas (1224–1274 ) wrote “that it is clear that a nocturnal orgasm is never a sin in itself. Though sometimes it is the result of a preceding sin.” (Which would have been a useful insight to have shared with the Cohen Gadol.) Just as the Jewish High Priest battled against wet dreams, Christian monks did so in the Middle Ages. According to van Driel “they even tied metal crucifixes to their genitals before going to bed to combat these temptations.”

Then the whole nocturnal erections thing got a bit out of hand, as van Driel describes. It’s well worth a read:

Following Augustine, ecclesiastical law considered it more or less a mortal sin if men with [erectile dysfunction] ED and hence infertile turned out to have entered into marriage. To the end of the 17th century, ED was an even ground for divorce. In an extensive study, the historian Pierre Darmon describes the manner in which those suffering from ED were treated in those days, especially in France. During the trials of the ecclesiastical courts, the defendants in any case had to prove that they possessed normal external genitals, and a jury composed of theologians, doctors, and midwives had to assess it. The court records show that, if necessary, the members of the jury sat at the defendant’s bedside at night to be able to judge any [sleep related erections] SREs occurring. The pompous rituals surrounding these trials indirectly confirmed the power of the Catholic Church. Initially, there was some degree of discretion, but in the course of the 16th century, the church authorities shifted sharply from spiritual voyeurism to actual voyeurism. By this time, they not only required a demonstration of the rigid erection but also of its “elasticity and natural movement.” Sometimes, the jury also insisted on having a demonstration of ejaculation. Naturally, as time went by, this was not enough either, and the married couple had to have sexual intercourse in the presence of the jury, the so-called “congress.” It was not until 1677 that the Catholic Church dispensed with impotence trials.

In men the nature of the genital organs is disobedient and self-willed, like a creature that is deaf to reason, and it attempts to dominate all because of its frenzied lusts.”
— Plato (427–347 BCE)

It was between the 17th to the 19th centuries that nocturnal emissions were first described as “pollutions,” though the Talmud had long described them this way. Van Driel wrote that in 1818, “a French surgeon named Jalade-Lafond even designed a corset for the penis, which reached from the shoulders to the knees. This was followed by many other devices, including a metal tube that dangled from a leather jerkin, a brainchild of the German Johann Fleck.” One of the “most influential figures in the scientific history of human sexuality,” a man by the name of Richard Freiherr von Krafft-Ebing (1840–1902), “was erroneously convinced that morning erections are induced by a full urinary bladder. Another founder of sexology, Henry Havelock Ellis (1859–1939), really feared Sleep Related Erections (SREs) and nocturnal ejaculations because in the Victorian Age, every child was taught that they would increase in frequency and lead to death.” Actually Ellis took the whole thing to a new level, and kept a diary that documented, over some eight years, his own nocturnal ejaculations, and his efforts to prevent them. Here is a excerpt:

It has been said that urinating will relieve the pressure and quiet the erection. I gave this a fair trial for a long period and found no difference in the net result, though sometimes an emission might be thereby postponed a day or so. Getting out of bed and walking up and down to allay erection was of similarly temporary effect.

Anonymously, he also published a paper in 1904 on his findings, noting that at age thirty, he averaged three to four per month. “This capacity will no doubt vary greatly in different individuals. In some it will be greater, in others less than this, but there is decidedly a physiological limit…. orgasm. Inhibition was very possible and never more than temporary. I need scarcely say that the emission was never induced.” Ever the scientist, he made sure to verify the source of the moisture. “I examined it once under a microscope and saw numbers of spermatozoa, proving it to be true semen.”

The Ages of Male Sexual Activity

In a 1980 paper titled the Age Aspects of the Male Sexual Activity, the author noted that “in contrast to all the other basic functions the sexual activity is notable for the most strongly pronounced dependencies from the age of a person.” It is suggested that there are four periods of male sexual activity and in the earliest of them, the pubertal phase, there are the first ejaculations. This occurs around 14 year of age, and about half occur as nocturnal emissions. That study was performed in Russia, but around the same time another collected information from 104 college aged males with an average age of 23. It found that most of the men (the plurality of which were Mormon) had experiences a nocturnal emissions.

In the 1970s Ismet Karacan published a series of papers with rather unforgettable titles, such as The ontogeny of nocturnal penile tumescence, The effect of sexual intercourse on sleep patterns and nocturnal penile erections and Sexual arousal and activity: Effect on subsequent nocturnal penile tumescence patterns. The upshot of these was the finding that during life, sleep related erections become fewer and shorter. As men age, they have fewer and fewer wet dreams, a finding also reported by the Russian researcher G. S. Vassilchenko, and shown in the graph below, where you should note the tail end of the graph. Which brings us back to the Talmud.

Four stages graph.png
ועתה ראה והבן, איך יבלבל את האדם ענין הנ”ל, וכי יש לו להתרעם על שלא היה לו נס כמו לכהן הגדול ביום הכפורים

Now understand, my son, how confusing this matter [of wet dreams] is, for should you resent the fact that a miracle did not occur [to prevent them] as it did for the Cohen Gadol?
— Rebbe Nachman of Breslov. Likkutei Moharan 2, Torah 117 (H.T. to Talmudology reader Asher Scheiner)

It never happened

Later in this tractate (21a) there is a list of miracles that occurred in the Temple.(This is also listed in the Mishanh in Avot, 5:5.) One of these was that the sacrificial meat never became putrid. Another was this:

יומא כב, א

וְלֹא אֵירַע קֶרִי לְכֹהֵן גָּדוֹל בְּיוֹם הַכִּפּוּרִים

And a seminal emission did not befall the High Priest on Yom Kippur.

The suggestion is that this was a miracle, and indeed it is listed as such. But a review of the science clearly demonstrates that there was nothing miraculous about this. Nocturnal emissions are a normal part of adolescence (in women too), and they decrease with age.

It will come as no surprise to recall that the Cohen Gadol, the High Priest who performed the Yom Kippur rituals, was an old, or older man. There were of course exceptions, and since the office was generally inherited, the Cohen Gadol might start his rein as a young man. Indeed Maimonides ruled that he could not start his reign until he was at least twenty years old (רמב׳ם משנה תורה, הלכות כלי המקדש 5:15 ). But it was usually a lifetime position. Eli, the high priest of the Mishkan at Shiloh, functioned as the Cohen Gadol until his death. At the age of 98. And John Hyrcanus (יוחנן הורקנוס) was born in 134 BCE and installed as Cohen Gadol in 164 BCE at the age of only thirty. But he held the post for some forty years until his death in 104 BCE at the age of seventy. The Cohen Gadol might start his rein subject to the same naturally produced nocturnal emissions as every other man. But as he aged these pollutions would decrease and eventually cease, not as a result of any miracle, but as a result of the normal physiology of aging.

Science vs Religion, again

When we think of areas of conflict between religion and science, we might at first consider evolution, or creation, and the like. But as we have just discovered, a topic as private as the cause of nocturnal seminal emissions, when properly understood, also raises a conflict. In the Talmud and in the later halakhic codes (such as the one below) such emissions are brought on by foods or by lustful thoughts. But a scientific explanation reveals that these emissions are common, are age (and likely hormonally) related, and are not necessarily related to erotic dreaming. Indeed, they are as natural as sleep itself. That’s what we should teach young boys as they begin puberty. But what should we teach them about this topic from a Jewish perspective, and how might the two be reconciled?

קיצור שולחן ערוך 151:5

מִי שֶרָאָה, חַס וְשָׁלוֹם, קְרִי בַּלַּיְלָה, כְּשֶׁנֵּעוֹר מִשְּׁנָתוֹ, יִטּוֹל יָדָיו וְיֹּאמַר בְּשִׁבְרוֹן לֵב, רִבּוֹנוֹ שֶל עוֹלָם, עָשִׂיתִי זֹאת שֶׁלֹּא בְּכַוָּנָה, רַק בְּהִרְהוּרִים רָעִים וּבְמַחֲשָׁבוֹת רָעוֹת. לָכֵן יְהִי רָצוֹן מִלְּפָנֶיךָ, ה' אֱלֹהַי וֵאלֹהֵי אֲבוֹתַי, מְחַק בְּרַחֲמֶיךָ הָרַבִּים עָוֹן זֶה, וְתַצִּילֵנִי מֵהִרְהוּרִים רָעִים וְכַיוֹצֵא בָהֶם לְעוֹלָם וָעֶד, אָמֵן וְכֵן יְהִי רָצוֹן

If, God forbid, you had a seminal emission at night, upon waking up from your sleep you should wash your hands and say with a contrite heart, "Master of the Universe I have done this unwittingly but it was due to sinful thoughts and sinful reflections; therefore, may it be Your will Adonoy, my God, and the God of my fathers, to erase this iniquity through your great mercy, and save me from sinful thoughts, and from similar occurrences forever and ever. Amein, so may it be Your will."

Next time on Talmudology:

Why sound travels further at night

Print Friendly and PDF

Yoma 15b ~ To the Right. Always to the Right

יומא טו, ב

כל פינות שאתה פונה לא יהו אלא דרך ימין...

All turns that you make must be towards the right

Homer Simpson Lefty Store.jpeg

Today's page of Talmud teaches that when walking up the ramp to the top of the Altar in the Temple, the Cohen must make a right turn at the top. Following that, every turn he makes must be a right turn. But why a right turn?

The importance of the right side in Judaism

In the Talmud and in normative Jewish practice, the preference to favor the right over the left is everywhere. Here are just a few. (How many more can you think of?)

  • Rav Ashi rules that Tefillin must placed it on the left arm, because it is weaker than the right and the action of placing them should be performed with the stronger right hand (מנחות לז, א).

  • The Talmud teaches that a right-handed person who writes with her left hand on Shabbat has not violated the prohibition against writing. It doesn't count. Maimonides (הלכות שבת 11:14) agrees:

הַכּוֹתֵב בִּשְׂמֹאלוֹ אוֹ לְאַחַר יָדוֹ בְּרַגְלוֹ בְּפִיו וּבְמַרְפֵּקוֹ פָּטוּר

  • According to Rava, walking should start with the right leg, and not the left (יומא יא, ב)

  • As we know from studying Zevachim, the entire service in the Temple in Jerusalem must be performed with the right hand (ביאת המקדש 5:18 )

  • The rite of חליצה must be performed with the right leg and a right shoe (יבמות קד, א).

  • The mezuzah can only be placed on the right side of the door (רמבם הל׳ מזוזה 6:12).

  • The best student of a rabbi should walk on the rabbi's right side, relegating the second best to the left (יומא לז, א).

  • Again in this tractate, Rabbi Yehudah stated that “the right hand of the deputy high priest (סגן כהן גדול) is superior to the left hand of the high priest (כהן גדול) (יומא לט,א)

  • After observing his teacher Rabbi Yehoshua, Rabbi Akiva taught that the left hand should be used after using the bathroom, out of respect to the right hand (ברכות סב,ב). When challenged as to why Rabbi Akiva was impertinent enough to report on which hand his teacher wiped himself he replied תורה היא וללמוד אני צריך - "this too is Torah, and I must study it".

לֵ֤ב חָכָם֙ לִֽימִינ֔וֹ וְלֵ֥ב כְּסִ֖יל לִשְׂמֹאלֽוֹ׃

A wise man’s mind tends toward the right hand, a fool’s toward the left.

— Kohelet 10:2

It's not Just Judaism

In Islam

The importance of all things right handed is found in other religions. For example, when Muslims perform any of the following, it is mustahabb [مستحبّ‎, - "recommended"] to start on the right or use the right hand.

  • putting on one's garment and pants and shoes

  • entering the mosque, using the siwaak [ a kind of toothpick]

  • putting on kohl [an ancient blue eye cosmetic]

  • clipping the nails

  • trimming the mustache

  • combing the hair plucking the armpit hair

  • shaving the head

  • saying salaam at the end of prayer

  • washing the limbs when purifying oneself

  • exiting the toilet, eating and drinking

  • shaking hands

  • touching the Black Stone [ٱلْحَجَرُ ٱلْأَسْوَد‎, al-Ḥajaru al-Aswad, a rock set into the eastern corner of the Kaaba, the ancient building located in the center of the Grand Mosque in Mecca, Saudi Arabia. Legend has it that the rock dates back to Adam and Eve.]

  • The Bukhari Sharif , one of the six major hadith collections of Sunni Islam rules along the lines of Rabbi Akiva:

"... when you urinate, do not touch your penis with your right hand. And when you cleanse yourself after defecation, do not use your right hand."

The right hand of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) was for his purification and food, and his left hand was for using the toilet and anything that was dirty...
— Sunan Abi Dawood (33)

in christianity

in hinduism

  • Offerings, such as flowers or garlands, are carried with both hands on the right side of the body.

  • "Pointing with the forefinger of the right hand or shaking the forefinger in emphasis while talking is never done. This is because the right hand possesses a powerful, aggressive pranic force, and an energy that moves the forces of the world."

  • Vāmācāra ( वामाचार, meaning "left-handed attainment" in Sanskrit) describes the "Left-Hand Path" or "Left-path" It is used to describe a particular mode of worship that is heterodox to standard Vedic teachings.

  • In Benares, the holiest of the seven sacred cities and sitting on the Ganges, "pilgrims circumambulate with their right hands towards the center, as Krishna is alleged to have done at the sacred mountain."

Well, you get the point.  Judaism, along with all the major religions (and some you've never heard of) emphasize the dominance of the right hand in all things holy. Or mundane.

The Ngaga of southern Borneo believe everything in the after-world is reversed, “sweet” becoming “bitter”, “straight” becoming “crooked”, and “right” becoming “left”. Likewise the Toraja of Celebes (Sulawesi) believed the dead do everything backwards, even pronouncing words backwards... the dead therefore use their left hand...
— I. C. Mcmanus. Right Hand, Left Hand: The Origins of Asymmetry in Brains, Bodies, Atoms and Cultures. Phoenix 2003, p27.

 and It's not just religions

There are lots of things that have chirality - meaning they have a mirror image but cannot be mapped onto that mirror image by rotations and translations. They exist in left or right-handed versions. Let's start with in easy example. Um, your hands. Although your right hand mirrors your left, your right hand cannot (comfortably) fit into a handed-glove.

From here.

From here.

Here's another example. Bend your fingers and extend your thumb as below. You've made two mirror images that cannot be mapped onto each other. (Go on. Give it a try. See what I mean?) That's chirality.

If we extend this to molecules, they are left or right-handed, meaning they are mirror images but they cannot be superimposed on each other. These are isomers. Like this:

From here.

From here.

And here is where things start to get really weird. Nearly everything in the universe - from chemicals and medications to fundamental particles and even galaxies themselves have a right-handed or left-handed preference. No, really. 

Let's start with the essential building blocks of life: amino acids and sugars. Almost all amino acids (not you, glycine) used by life on earth (but not necessarily elsewhere in the universe) are left-handed.  Right-handed amino acids exist of course. They're just not utilized by any life form on earth. Any.  If you sit in a lab and cook up an amino acid from its ingredients, you will make an equal amount of the left and right handed variates. That's just good old chemistry at work. But life on earth can only use half the mixture: the L form. Some bacteria can actually convert right-handed amino acids into the left-handed version, but they can’t use the right-handed ones as is.

Like amino acids, sugars also come in two isomers, but those that are used by life forms on earth are the right-handed variety. All the enzymes that living things use to manipulate amino acids and sugars only work on left-handed amino acids and right-handed sugars. They simply can't use the opposites. Why did life turn out this way? Truth is, nobody knows.  

Medications also exhibit chirality. For example, propranolol is commonly used to help control high blood pressure. Some of you reading this may be taking it. The left form (L-propranolol) is the one that helps. The right form (known as D-propranolol) is inactive. (The Latin for left and right is laevus and dexter, respectively.)

Quinine is an antimalarial drug. It has an isomer called quinidine, and quinidine has no anti-malarial action. But it's a great drug to reduce arrhythmias of the heart. One compound, with two isomers, each with their own remarkable and very different healing properties.

Now consider muons, a fundamental particle in our universe. It is kind of like an electron, but about 200 times heavier. Muons have an average life-expectancy of 2.2 microseconds (so don't expect any kind of long-term relationship) after which time they decay into an electron, a neutrino, and an anitneutirno. The direction that the electron will come out depends on the direction in which the muon spins. Now you would expect there to be equal amounts of electrons that are ejected spinning one way or another. But there aren't.  What happens is that 99.9% of muons decay in a right-handed fashion.

And while we are on the subject of decaying muons, let's talk about those neutrinos, which are a weird fundamental particle with the smallest mass of any known thing. They too, have a preference for the right or left. All neutrinos are left handed, while all anti-neutrinos (whatever that means) are right handed.

Left and right handed galaxies. From here.

Left and right handed galaxies. From here.

Ready for more? Statistically speaking our universe should contain an equal amount of left and right handed galaxies (as noted in how they spin). But this should not occur. In an analysis of over 2,600 nearby spiral galaxies and a later analysis of 15,000 more, Michael Longo demonstrated that that left-handed spirals are more common in the northern hemisphere, above the northern galactic pole. And although the signal is less strong, right-handed spirals appear more frequently in the south.

It's good to be a leftie

About 10-13% of humans are left-handed. (Captive chimpanzees are more left-handed than us, with an approximate 2:1 ratio of righties to lefties. In us it's more like 8:1) But aside from the problem of not finding scissors that work for you, being a leftie gives you some pretty good advantages.

...not only left-handers are over-represented in confrontational sports, but the closer the physical interaction of the opponents such as in boxing, fencing, judo, or karate, the greater the prevalence of left-handers. In basketball, football, handball, table tennis, tennis, and volleyball, for instance, competitors stand some distance apart and do not confront directly. But even in these sports, there are more than the expected number of left-handers...
— Grouios G. et al. Do left-handed competitors have an innate superiority in sports? Perception and Motor Skills, 2000:90;1273-1282

At the undergraduate level they are more likely to take part in a whole range of events, from judo and fencing and soccer and volleyball. But when it comes to non-confrontational sports like cycle racing, running or swimming, the proportion of left handers fall back to that of the general population. Lefties make up about 10% of the population, but 23% of all Wimbledon tennis champions were lefties.

There is a lot more evidence that lefties have many advantages over (us) righties. In a complicated test of spatial skills which you can read about here, 47 lefties demonstrated faster and more accurate spatial skills than the 50 righties, along with strong executive control and mental flexibility. And in this study of 100 lefties and 100 righties, the left-handed demonstrated greater creativity than the right-handed on all 4 scales of the Torrance test which examines creative thinking.

Obama writes with his left hand.jpg

And lefties appear to be smarter that righties.  In a study of some 300 gifted children, left (-or mixed-handedness) occurred more frequently in those who were mathematically or verbally precocious (for our readers in the US, this meant an SAT-M score of more than 700 and an SAT-L score of more than 630). Of the last 15 US presidents, seven (about 47%) have been left-handed.  That's almost 1 in 2! Oh, and compared with righties, college-educated left-handers in the US earn 10-15% more.

Leonardo da Vinci was a lefty, as were Michelangelo, Isaac Newton, and Albert Einstein.

Despite these, and many other advantages, our cultures have stigmatized those who are left-handed. We all know that the word sinister (meaning something harmful or evil is going to happen) comes from the Latin sinister meaning left.  But there are more examples of anti-left associations in other languages too. Adroit, meaning clever or skillful comes from the French word for right droite, meaning dextrous. In German, linkisch means awkward, and it comes from the German links, meaning left. And so it goes on.

Back to the Jewish Bible

Left-handed people are mentioned only three times in Tanach, and all come from the tribe of Benjamin:

  • There were the 700 men from the tribe of Benjamin who could use a sling with deadly accuracy (שופתים 20:16):

מִכֹּ֣ל ׀ הָעָ֣ם הַזֶּ֗ה שְׁבַ֤ע מֵאוֹת֙ אִ֣ישׁ בָּח֔וּר אִטֵּ֖ר יַד־יְמִינ֑וֹ כָּל־זֶ֗ה קֹלֵ֧עַ בָּאֶ֛בֶן אֶל־הַֽשַּׂעֲרָ֖ה וְלֹ֥א יַחֲטִֽא׃

  • There were the ambidextrous men who came to fight for King David at Ziklag, who were from the tribe of Benjamin (דברי הימים א, 12:2)

נֹ֣שְׁקֵי קֶ֗שֶׁת מַיְמִינִ֤ים וּמַשְׂמִאלִים֙ בָּֽאֲבָנִ֔ים וּבַחִצִּ֖ים בַּקָּ֑שֶׁת מֵאֲחֵ֥י שָׁא֖וּל מִבִּנְיָמִֽן׃

  • And perhaps most famously there was the left-handed Ehud ( אֶת־אֵה֤וּד בֶּן־גֵּרָא֙ בֶּן־הַיְמִינִ֔י אִ֥ישׁ אִטֵּ֖ר יַד־יְמִינ֑וֹ) who assassinated the Moabite king Eglon (שופתים 3:12-30). Because Ehud was left-handed he hid his dagger on his right side. In this way he got past the body search outside the throne room, where the guards looked for a weapon on the left. As for the rest, well, read on:וַיִּשְׁלַ֤ח אֵהוּד֙ אֶת־יַ֣ד שְׂמֹאל֔וֹ וַיִּקַּח֙ אֶת־הַחֶ֔רֶב מֵעַ֖ל יֶ֣רֶךְ יְמִינ֑וֹ וַיִּתְקָעֶ֖הָ בְּבִטְנֽוֹ׃ וַיָּבֹ֨א גַֽם־הַנִּצָּ֜ב אַחַ֣ר הַלַּ֗הַב וַיִּסְגֹּ֤ר הַחֵ֙לֶב֙ בְּעַ֣ד הַלַּ֔הַב כִּ֣י לֹ֥א שָׁלַ֛ף הַחֶ֖רֶב מִבִּטְנ֑וֹ וַיֵּצֵ֖א הַֽפַּרְשְׁדֹֽנָה׃ Reaching with his left hand, Ehud drew the dagger from his right side and drove it into [Eglon’s] belly. The fat closed over the blade and the hilt went in after the blade—for he did not pull the dagger out of his belly—and the filth came out.

All of this is really strange because of course the name of this tribe  - Benjamin - literally means "the son of the right" בן ימין.  

Back to Yoma

Today's daf yomi page of Talmud has a very short instruction:"All turns that you make must be towards the right." But this phrase reveals a profound truth about who we are as humans, and of the very stuff from which we are made.  In culture after culture, in religions after religion, and in the very structure of our universe, there are left or right-handed preferences and predilections, many of which we simply cannot currently explain. Our religious and cultural preferences for the right likely stems from the simple fact that left-handedness is eight times less common. Unfortunately, a suspicion of the other, of those who are not like the majority, is a common trait that in one way or another we all share. But it needn't be so. The other, those in the minority, teach us and enrich our lives. Heck, they are often even smarter and quicker than the majority.  We are all better off with them.

[Repost from Zevachim 62.]

Print Friendly and PDF

Yoma 10a ~ On the Origins of Nations

Today’s page of Talmud digresses into a discussion of where we come from.

יומא י, א

וּפָרְסָאֵי מְנָא לַן דְּמִיֶּפֶת קָאָתוּ, דִּכְתִיב: ״בְּנֵי יֶפֶת גּוֹמֶר וּמָגוֹג וּמָדַי וְיָוָן וְתוּבָל וּמֶשֶׁךְ וְתִירָס״. גּוֹמֶר — זֶה גֶּרְמַמְיָא, מָגוֹג — זוֹ קַנְדִּיָּא, מָדַי — זוֹ מַקֵדוֹנְיָא, יָוָן — כְּמַשְׁמָעוֹ, תּוּבָל — זֶה בֵּית אוּנַיְיקִי, מֶשֶׁךְ — זוֹ מוּסְיָא, תִּירָס, פְּלִיגִי בַּהּ רַבִּי סִימַאי וְרַבָּנַן, וְאָמְרִי לַהּ רַבִּי סִימוֹן וְרַבָּנַן, חַד אָמַר: זוֹ בֵּית תְּרַיְיקִי, וְחַד אָמַר: זוֹ פָּרַס. תָּנֵי רַב יוֹסֵף: תִּירָס — זוֹ פָּרַס

From where do we derive that the Persians descend from Japhet? The Gemara answers: As it is written: “The sons of Japheth were Gomer and Magog and Madai and Javan and Tuval and Meshech and Tiras” (Genesis 10:2). The Gemara explains: Gomer, that is Germamya; Magog, that is Kandiya; Madai, that is Macedonia; Javan, in accordance with its plain meaning, Greece; Tuval, that is the nation called Beit Unaiki; Meshech, that is Musya. With regard to Tiras, Rabbi Simai and the Rabbis disagree, and some say the dispute is between Rabbi Simon and the Rabbis: One said: That is Beit Teraiki, and one said: That is Persia. According to that approach, Persia is listed among the descendants of Japheth. Rav Yosef taught: Tiras is Persia.

So according to the Talmud, the Germans, the Cretans (inhabitants of Crete - Kandia in Hebrew and the largest and most populous of the Greek islands), the Macedonians, the Greeks, Macedonians and the Persians all descended from Japhet.

Where did the Indo-Europeans come from?

There are only a limited number of ways that we can reconstruct the origins of Indo-Europeans. One is through DNA testing of both the living and the dead, as we will return to this later. A second way is to look at language as a way of identifying common ancestry. It may not be as precise as DNA sequencing, but as David W. Anthony and Don Ringe pointed out in their 2015 paper The Indo-European Homeland from Linguistic and Archaeological Perspectives, it is possible to reconstruct a prehistoric language such as Proto- Indo-European (PIE), though with many qualifications. “Because the grammar fragment, phonological system, and lexemes that are reconstructible for PIE reveal a coherent, unremarkable human language…the PIE-speaking community might, given the correct integrative methods, be correlated with the reality recovered by archaeology.”

One fact especially makes the connection of prehistoric languages with prehistoric material cultures worth pursuing. Some of the words that we can reconstruct for protolanguages have very specific meanings, and a few refer to technological developments that can be dated independently and correlated with the archaeological record. That is crucial because, in the absence of writing, archaeology yields no direct evidence for the language spoken by the people who made a particular group of artifacts. Under most circumstances, only the indirect correlation of datable artifacts and the words that refer to them can connect linguistic prehistory with archaeology. In this respect, too, PIE is a fortunate case.
— David W. Anthony and Don Ringe. The Indo-European Homeland from Linguistic and Archaeological Perspectives. Annu. Rev. Linguist. 2015. 1:199–219

This linguistic archeology is a complicated business: There are at least ten groups of Indo-European (IE) languages, and, according to Anthony and Ringe, none are closely related to the others.

Determining the order in which they diverged from each other, called subgrouping, has proved surprisingly difficult but a consensus is emerging. It seems clear that the ancestor of the Anatolian subgroup (which includes Hittite) separated from the other dialects of PIE first, so from a cladistic point of view Anatolian is half the IE family. Within the non-Anatolian half, it appears that the ancestor of the Tocharian subgroup (whose attested languages were spoken in Xinjiang, today in western China, until approximately the tenth century CE) separated from the other dialects before the latter had diverged much. It follows that an item inherited by two or more of the daughter subgroups can be reconstructed for “early” PIE only if it is attested in at least one Anatolian language and at least one non-Anatolian language, and such an item can be reconstructed for the ancestor of the non-Anatolian subgroups only if it is attested in one or both of the Tocharian languages and in some other IE language.

The Case of the Word “Wheel”

Thanks to some solid carbon dating, we know that the invention of the wheel-and-axle principle, which first made wagons and carts possible, occurred around 4000–3500 BCE. So by looking at the words for axle and wheel it may be possible to reconstruct the origins of the word, and from there figure out the origins of the peoples themselves.

Wheel terms found in Indo-European language branches.  From David W. Anthony and Don Ringe. The Indo-European Homeland from Linguistic and Archaeological Perspectives. Annu. Rev. Linguist. 2015. 1:199–219.

Wheel terms found in Indo-European language branches. From David W. Anthony and Don Ringe. The Indo-European Homeland from Linguistic and Archaeological Perspectives. Annu. Rev. Linguist. 2015. 1:199–219.

So, for example, the words for wheel and cart/wagon/chariot take one of two common forms, which are thought to be linked with two PIE roots: the root kʷel- "move around" is the basis of the unique derivative kʷekʷlo- "wheel" which becomes hvél (wheel) in Old Icelandic, kolo (wheel, circle) in Old Church Slavonic, kãkla- (neck) in Lithuanian, kyklo- (wheel, circle) in Greek, cakka-/cakra- (wheel) in Pali and Sanskrit, and kukäl (wagon, chariot) in Tocharian A. The root ret(h)- becomes rad (wheel) in Old High German, rota (wheel) in Latin, rãtas (wheel) in Lithuanian, and ratha (wagon, chariot) in Sanskrit.

The Anatolian hypothesis suggests that speakers of PIE lived in Anatolia (mostly modern day Turkey) during the Neolithic period (10,000–4,500 BCE). From there, Indo-European languages spread into Europe and Asia minor around 7,000 BCE. They then split into three major clades: Indo-European languages in Europe, Dravidian languages in Pakistan and India, and Afroasiatic languages in the Arabian Peninsula and North Africa.

The DNA evidence

In a 2015 paper published in the prestigious journal Nature, a massive international team of researchers with backgrounds in evolutionary genetics, archeology, linguistics, evolutionary biology, history and anthropology analyzed the genetic material from 101 ancient humans from across Eurasia. They demonstrated that “the Bronze Age was a highly dynamic period involving large-scale population migrations and replacements, responsible for shaping major parts of present-day demographic structure in both Europe and Asia.” And importantly, they note that their findings “are consistent with the hypothesized spread of Indo-European languages during the Early Bronze Age.”

Our analyses support that migrations during the Early Bronze Age is a probable scenario for the spread of Indo-European languages, in line with reconstructions based on some archaeological and historical linguistic data... Importantly, however, although our results support a correspondence between cultural changes, migrations, and linguistic patterns, we caution that such relationships cannot always be expected but must be demonstrated case by case.

The Proto-Indo-European homeland, with migrations outward at about 4200 BCE (1), 3300 BCE (2), and 3000 BCE (3a and 3b). A tree diagram (inset) shows the pre-Germanic split as unresolved. From David W. Anthony and Don Ringe. The Indo-European Homela…

The Proto-Indo-European homeland, with migrations outward at about 4200 BCE (1), 3300 BCE (2), and 3000 BCE (3a and 3b). A tree diagram (inset) shows the pre-Germanic split as unresolved. From David W. Anthony and Don Ringe. The Indo-European Homeland from Linguistic and Archaeological Perspectives. Annu. Rev. Linguist. 2015. 1:199–219.

Today’s page of Talmud claims that peoples as diverse as the ancient Germans, Greeks, Macedonians and Persians originally came from a single shared ancestor: Japhet, third son of Noah. Studies from the modern disciplines as diverse as history, linguistics, genetics and anthropology have concluded that Europeans and Iranians shared a common origin in the steppes of Anatolia. Both origin stories remind us that whatever our national identities, we have much more in common with others than we could have ever imagined.

Print Friendly and PDF

Yoma 8a ~ God's Name. Tattooed.

On a delightful sunny day in August 2012 I was enjoying a refreshing Coke with my family at a quiet coffee shop in Toledo, Spain, where we were on vacation. Near us was man enjoying his own refreshment, and I could not help notice the tattoo on his left arm.

Madrid & Toledo Vacation 2009.jpg

And then I noticed the tattoo on his right arm. Eloheynu - “Our God.”

Madrid & Toledo Vacation 2009 (1).jpg

Unfortunately there was a language barrier that prevented us from having what would have been, I am sure, a most interesting little chat. I might even have shared with this nice man with a gentle smile the ruling from today’s page of Talmud:

יומא ח, א

הֲרֵי שֶׁהָיָה שֵׁם כָּתוּב עַל בְּשָׂרוֹ — הֲרֵי זֶה לֹא יִרְחַץ וְלֹא יָסוּךְ וְלֹא יַעֲמוֹד בִּמְקוֹם הַטִּנּוֹפֶת. נִזְדַּמְּנָה לוֹ טְבִילָה שֶׁל מִצְוָה — כּוֹרֵךְ עָלָיו גֶּמִי וְטוֹבֵל. רַבִּי יוֹסֵי אוֹמֵר: יוֹרֵד וְטוֹבֵל כְּדַרְכּוֹ, וּבִלְבַד שֶׁלֹּא יְשַׁפְשֵׁף

It was taught in a baraita: With regard to one who had a sacred name of God written on his flesh, he may neither bathe, nor smear oil on his flesh, nor stand in a place of filth. If an immersion by means of which he fulfills a mitzva happened to present itself to him, he wraps a reed over God’s name and then descends and immerses, allowing the water to penetrate so that there will be no interposition between him and the water. Rabbi Yossi says: Actually, he descends and immerses in his usual manner, and he need not wrap a reed over the name, provided that he does not rub the spot and erase the name.

Rabbi Yossi implies that the name of God was literally written on the skin, rather than tattooed. And this is how Rashi explains the Talmud:

לא ירחץ – שלא ימחקנו. ואזהרה למוחק את השם "ואבדתם את השם" וסמיך ליה "לא תעשון ן וגו'

He may not bathe - to prevent it from being erased…

This was codified by Maimonides in his Mishneh Torah:

רמב’ם משנה תורה הל׳ יסידי התורה 6:6

וְכֵן אִם הָיָה שֵׁם כָּתוּב עַל בְּשָׂרוֹ הֲרֵי זֶה לֹא יִרְחַץ וְלֹא יָסוּךְ וְלֹא יַעֲמֹד בִּמְקוֹם הַטִּנֹּפֶת. נִזְדַּמְּנָה לוֹ טְבִילָה שֶׁל מִצְוָה כּוֹרֵךְ עָלָיו גֶּמִי וְטוֹבֵל. וְאִם לֹא מָצָא גֶּמִי מְסַבֵּב בִּבְגָדָיו וְלֹא יְהַדֵּק כְּדֵי שֶׁלֹּא יָחֹץ. שֶׁלֹּא אָמְרוּ לִכְרֹךְ עָלָיו אֶלָּא מִפְּנֵי שֶׁאָסוּר לַעֲמֹד בִּפְנֵי הַשֵּׁם כְּשֶׁהוּא עָרֹם

…If one had a Name written upon his flesh, he shall not wash, anoint himself or remain in unclean places; if he must undergo a mandatory immersion, he shall cover it with a leaf or, when no leaf is to be found, with part of his garments, yet must he not fasten it lest it be obstructive to the immersion, because the only reason it was said to cover the tattoo is because it is forbidden to remain naked in the Presence of the God’s Name.

But it is also possible that the Talmud is referring to a more extreme form of writing on the skin: tattooing. On that sunny day in Spain I was surprised to find that God’s Hebrew name was something people would tattoo on themselves. But I should not have been. As today’s page of Talmud makes clear, people have been writing God’s name on themselves for a long time. And so here, for your viewing delight are some other examples of this phenomenon.

Let’s start with one that is not the name of God, but a common word associated with good luck. It is the Hebrew word חי chai, meaning life.

From here

From here

Ok, the next one doesn’t count. It is a poor transliteration of the four letter name of God י–ה–ו–ה written in English as “Yahweh.”

From here.

From here.

But this one is unmistakably God’s ineffable name. Or it will be once the thing is finished and someone colors in the letters.

From here.

From here.

Not sure what is going on here. This Hebrew tattoo means “But God [Elohim].” But God what?

From here.

From here.

Here is another one using the word Elohim. (This image was rotated 90 degrees to enable you to read the words easily.)

It is a quote from Psalms 46:11 הַרְפּ֣וּ וּ֭דְעוּ כִּי־אָנֹכִ֣י אֱלֹהִ֑ים אָר֥וּם בַּ֝גּוֹיִ֗ם אָר֥וּם בָּאָֽרֶץ׃ “Desist! Realize that I am God! I dominate the nations; I dominate the earth.”

From here.

From here.

Same verse. Only smaller. And this one has the advantage that when immersing in a Mikveh [ritual bath], it may easily be covered with a sock.

From here.

From here.

Next, “God is King.” Possibly the winner in the category “Largest Hebrew Name-of God Tattoo.”

From here.

From here.

Another example of the four letter name of God tattooed. Twice. And another winner, this time in the category of “I forgot my prayer book - what are the words?” It is Psalm 23. All of it.

From here.

From here.

The Jewish Prohibition against Tattooing

Jews are forbidden to get a tattoo. The origin of this prohibition is found in the Torah (Lev. 19:28)

וְשֶׂ֣רֶט לָנֶ֗פֶשׁ לֹ֤א תִתְּנוּ֙ בִּבְשַׂרְכֶ֔ם וּכְתֹ֣בֶת קַֽעֲקַ֔ע לֹ֥א תִתְּנ֖וּ בָּכֶ֑ם אֲנִ֖י יְהוָֽה׃

You shall not make gashes in your flesh for the dead, or incise any marks on yourselves: I am the Lord.

Maimonides is clear:

משנה תורה, מצוות לא תעשה מ״א

שלא לכתוב בגוף כעובדי עבודה זרה, שנאמר "וכתובת קעקע, לא תיתנו בכם" (ויקרא יט,כח)

Mishneh Torah, Negative Mitzvot 41

Not to tattoo the body, like the idolaters, as it is said, “…. nor shall ye print any marks upon you” (Lev. 19:28).

And here is the Sefer HaChinuch, an important anonymous work written in Spain sometime in the 13th-century. It details the 613 commandments and explains the reasons behind them.

Sefer HaChinukh 253:1

That we not imprint an imprinted tattoo into our flesh:

To not imprint an imprinted tattoo into our flesh, as it is stated (Leviticus 19:28), "and an imprinted tattoo you shall not put into your flesh." And the content is like that which the Yishmaelites do today, as they imprint an imprint that is inscribed and stuck into their flesh, such that it is never erased. And the liability is only with an imprint that is inscribed and impressed with ink or blue dye or with other colors that make an impression. And so did they say in Makkot 21a, "[If] he tattooed, but did not imprint" - meaning to say, he did not make an impression with color - "[if] he imprinted, but did not tattoo" - meaning to say that he did make an impression [on] his flesh with a color, but he did not make a marking in his flesh - " he is not liable, until he imprints, and tattoos with ink, or with blue dye or with anything that makes an impression."

Still, the Torah ruling is specific: “You shall not make gashes in your flesh for the dead.” But what if the gashes are not made “for the dead”? As a 2008 article from the New York Times made clear, many contemporary Jews grapple with the prohibition.

Andy Abrams, a filmmaker, has spent five years making a documentary called “Tattoo Jew.” In his interviews with dozens of Jews with body art, he’s noticed the prevalence of Jewish-themed tattoos from Stars of David to elaborate Holocaust memorials, surprising since one reason Jewish culture opposes tattoos is that Jews were involuntarily marked in concentration camps.

And that thing you’ve heard that a Jew with a tattoo cannot be buried in a Jewish cemetery? Nonsense. An urban legend. As The New York Times noted:

But the edict [against a Jew with a tattoo being buried in a Jewish cemetery] isn’t true. The eight rabbinical scholars interviewed for this article, from institutions like the Jewish Theological Seminary and Yeshiva University, said it’s an urban legend, most likely started because a specific cemetery had a policy against tattoos. Jewish parents and grandparents picked up on it and over time, their distaste for tattoos was presented as scriptural doctrine.

What is remarkable is today’s page of Talmud in which there is no comment made about how a Jewish person could ever be in the position of having to cover a tattoo. It just took it for granted that such a case could occur. Perhaps the person transgressed the prohibition, and now want to bathe in the cleansing waters of the ritual mikveh.

It’s difficult to know exactly how many young Jews are being tattooed, because no organization tracks these numbers. But a pro-tattoo community is emerging online. Christopher Stedman, a 23-year-old student in Rohnert Park, Calif., started a MySpace group called “Jews with Tattoos” in 2004, after noticing more Jewish friends being tattooed. The group now has 839 members.
— The New York Times, "For Some Jews, It Only Sounds Like ‘Taboo’." July 17, 2008.

Why Tattoo?

In his fascinating book Science Ink: Tattoos of the Science Obsessed, Carl Zimmer wrote that scientists get tattoos (and many of them do, judging from this book) “in order to mark themselves with an aspect of the world that has marked them deeply within. It is not simply the thing in the tattoo that matters…tattoos are a tribal marking: they display a membership with the universe itself.” And for those with the proclivity, what better way is there to remember the God who got the whole thing rolling than by tattooing of his name.

Two beautiful equations on the arms of Adam Simpson, who worked at the National Center for Computational Sciences.  “I got the tattoos because it’s amazing to me how just a few characters can impact the world so much, and I want others to know that.…

Two beautiful equations on the arms of Adam Simpson, who worked at the National Center for Computational Sciences. “I got the tattoos because it’s amazing to me how just a few characters can impact the world so much, and I want others to know that.” From Carl Zimmer, Science Ink; Tattoos of the Science Obsessed. New York. Sterling 2011. p28.

Print Friendly and PDF